Ozzy's Blog

Click here for part 3 of this tutorial series, where we used a BindableEvent to take all the work out of creating our own event system. Ok, maybe not all the work, but still…The limitations are real with BindableEvents. Namely the arguments from firing them can’t include special tables, and that’s a problem when we’re working with our custom objects with metatables. Let’s fix it with a little bit of Lua magic.

First off, we need to save the original values when the event is fired. We don’t know what variables are sent to the fire  method, but we are able to save them with a table using the …  operator. If you want to know the nitty-gritty, definitely read section 5.2 on variable arguments in Programming in Lua. Let’s add an argument table and an argument count fields in the event itself:

function Event.new()
	local self = setmetatable({
		bindableEvent = Instance.new("BindableEvent");
		argData = nil;
		argCount = nil;
	}, Event)
	return self
end

Note that we don’t have to add these here, by the way. Initializing them to nil does do anything except let us, the programmers, know that these are accessible fields that we’ll use in the future. It’s good practice, so you should get in the habit of showing these fields here.

Next, let’s save the arguments and argument count in these fields by revisiting our fire function:

function Event:fire(...)
	self.argData = {...}
	self.argCount = select("#", ...)
	self.bindableEvent:Fire()
end

Notice how we use …  within a table to capture the values into argData . We can now use this table to inspect the possibly many arguments passed. Also, an important detail is the use of the select  function: if you give “#”  as the first argument, it returns the number of arguments passed after it. We just use  …  again here to do that. Finally, we aren’t even sending anything to the BindableEvent anymore since we’re handling that ourselves. It’s best to remove it for efficiency’s sake.

Okay, now we have all the information saved! How do we use it? We have to get a bit creative with our connect function. Instead of connecting the function directly to the BindableEvent’s Event, we need to connect our own anonymous function. Inside, we’ll unpack  the arguments we saved while firing the event, and use that to call our function.

function Event:connect(func)
	if not func then error("connect(nil)", 2) end
	return self.bindableEvent.Event:connect(function ()
		func(unpack(self.argData, 1, self.argCount))
	end)
end

We use unpack  here in order to return each of the saved arguments from 1 to the number we saved. I’ll save the detailed explanation of unpack for section 5.1 in Programming in Lua. Just know that it’s like returning multiple values from a function, except for unpack  it’s the multiple values are all the indices of the table we give it.

And that should solve our problems with the BindableEvent! We get all the nice threading that Roblox provides internally while working around the table limitations by saving and unpacking them ourselves. Try out the final product with the test code from part 3 and you’ll see the improvement.

And there you have it – just a few ways you can create and use your own custom events within your Lua code on Roblox. You can download the final Event class code here. I had to whittle down my examples to just these 3, so if there’s interest I’ll post others. If you have questions, send me a direct message on Twitter or a message on Roblox. Thanks!

Click here for part 2 of this tutorial series. In part 2, we created a simple solution to our problem of creating an event system. We saw there are some problems with this, namely the synchronous execution. One after another, our connected functions are called when the event is fired.

Often times, when you’re using a game engine it’s best to let the engine do the heavy lifting for you. Roblox provides the BindableEvent object to create events in (or out of) the game hierarchy, however it isn’t often that you’ll want to instantiate one every time you want to create a custom event. Let’s create an Event class which uses BindableEvent internally intstead. Let’s re-start with the boilerplate from part 2:

-- A new Event class that uses BindableEvent internally
local Event = {}
Event.__index = Event

function Event.new()
	local self = setmetatable({
		bindableEvent = Instance.new("BindableEvent");
	}, Event)
	return Event
end

We’re no longer keeping track of the connections ourselves with a table. We’ll merely be passing the connect and fire behaviors onto the already existing functionality of the object. This is quite simple, actually:

function Event:connect(func)
	return self.bindableEvent.Event:connect(func)
end

function Event:fire(...)
	self.bindableEvent:Fire(...)
end

The key benefit here: since we’re delegating the responsibility of calling the connected functions to the BindableEvent, it can handle the threading as well. Connected functions that yield will not block other connected functions, so this is a primary benefit from the first simple solution. Note the use of …  to represent “any and all variables passed to this function”. We’ll talk more about it in part 4.

There is still a problem with this, though. BindableEvents were originally created for inter-script communication. When it comes to tables, there’s some “gotchas”

Avoid passing a mixed table (some values indexed by number and others by key), as only the data indexed by number will be passed.

BindableEvent documentation

This is a big drawback to using a BindableEvent. Your tables will not be the same table as the one you fired the event with. Here’s an example demonstrating this drawback:

local event = Event.new()
local my_table = {}

local function onEvent(other_table)
	error(other_table == my_table, "Fail whale!")
end

event:connect(onEvent)
event:fire(my_table)

You can see that we are firing the event with my_table , then in the connected function comparing that table to (supposedly) itself. This shouldn’t ever throw an error, but it always does due to the described limitations of the BindableEvent.

You’ll also lose metatables, too! So if you created an object using our object-oriented tricks from the previous tutorial, you won’t have an object anymore. Just an empty shell of a table, no purpose, no meaning in life… definitely something you want to avoid.

You can see that the key benefit of letting Roblox handle the threading with the cost of the BindableEvent’s limitations is definitely a trade-off. You can download the finished version of this Event class here. Is it possible to work around this limitation? Maybe. Click here to find out in part 4.

Click here for part 1 of this tutorial series. You should be familiar with the content discussed in my Object-Oriented Programming tutorial.

In part 1, I discussed the pattern of an event system and the need for it in Roblox code. We frequently find ourselves needing to define our own gameplay defined events. Let’s dive into a simple way we can implement this pattern. Let’s use the OOP tricks we know in Lua to create the shell of an Event class.

-- A shell of an event class
local Event = {}
Event.__index = Event

function Event.new()
	local self = setmetatable({
		-- We'll put any variables (fields) we need here
	}, Event)
	return Event
end

function Event:connect(func)
	-- Somehow keep track of the functions connected here
	-- Provide a means to disconnect this function from this event
end

function Event:fire(...)
	-- Call all the functions somehow
end

So, at surface level we need a way to store some number of functions. We should be able to add/remove those functions. Crazy idea: let’s just use a numerically-indexed table of functions. We’ll use table.insert  to connect a function, and to disconnect we’ll iterate over each index and remove the first we find that matches. When we fire the event, just iterate over the list of functions, calling them in order. Let’s code it up.

First, let’s add a connections  table to our event. This will be our table of functions.

function Event.new()
	local self = setmetatable({
		connections = {};
	}, Event)
	return self
end

Next, let’s write the fire function. Simple iteration using a numeric for-loop:

function Event:fire(...)
	for i = 1, #self.connections do
		self.connections[i](...)
	end
end

That oughta do it! Finally, let’s write the connect function.

function Event:connect(func)
	if not func then error("connect(nil)", 2) end
	table.insert(self.connections, func)
end

Notice how I added a line that will throw an error if we sent no function to connect. Finally, we need to add a means to disconnect. Let’s return a table with a disconnect function as a key:

function Event:connect(func)
	if not func then error("connect(nil)", 2) end
	table.insert(self.connections, func)
	
	local function disconnectFunc()
		for i = 1, #self.connections do
			if self.connections[i] == func then
				table.remove(self.connections, i)
				break
			end
		end
	end
	return {disconnect = disconnectFunc}
end

And there we have it! We’ll soon find out that there are some issues with this. For simple uses cases, this works fine. However, if any connected functions yield (yielding essentially means waiting, like announceGameOver does to display the message), the next connected function will not run until the yielding function completes. This is a problem in the part 1 example because we might want our map to clean up first, then the game to announce the final score. It depends on the order in which we connected our events.

This event system calls connected functions in the order they were connected. In other words, first-in-first-out (FIFO). We could reverse this order (last-in-first-out, LIFO) by iterating backwards in the fire function:

function Event:fire(...)
	for i = #self.connections, 1, -1 do
		self.connections[i](...)
	end
end

Alternatively, we could just insert new functions at the beginning of the list in connect by specifying index 1 as the insertion point in the table.insert  call:

table.insert(self.connections, 1, func)

This is actually less efficient as Lua must move all the existing functions in the table over by 1 to make room for the one we’re inserting. For the computer science nerds in the audience, this is an O(n) operation. Simply inserting to the end of the list would be O(1). It goes without saying that making both of these changes (reverse iteration and insertion at the front of the list) would cancel each other out and we’d be back to original behavior of FIFO.

If this solves your problem, then I have good news: you can stop here. As for the rest of us, we have more options to explore in part 3. You can download the finished version of this Event class here.

Click here to advance to part 3 of this tutorial series.

Hey everyone. Lately I’ve been considering the many ways to create event systems for Roblox Lua. You may already be familiar with native events, a.k.a. RBXScriptSignal, in Roblox. You connect your function to one of these, and when the engine detects the occurrence, it calls your function with the relevant arguments. BasePart.Touched is one of the most common examples.

But what if you’re making your own objects, like in my object-oriented programming tutorial? If your custom objects want to define events, you have a ton of different options for implementing this pattern. In this tutorial series, I will explore the different methods you can use to implement an event-listener pattern.

Before we look at the different ways we could create a system like this, let’s define exactly what we’re trying to code up. We want to be able to create an event and connect any number of functions to it. In addition, we want to send arguments to the connected functions when this event is fired. Finally, we need to be able to disconnect a connected function from this event. So, no matter what systems we end up making, we should be able to do something like this (for example, in a round-based game):

local function announceGameOver(finalScore)
	print("Game over!")
	local message = Instance.new("Message")
	message.Text = "Game over! Your score: " .. finalScore
	message.Parent = workspace
	wait(2)
	message:Destroy()
end

local function cleanUpTheGame()
	-- Destroy the map if we have one
	if workspace:FindFirstChild("Map") then
		workspace.Map:Destroy()
	end
	-- Clean up any debris on the ground
	while workspace:FindFirstChild("Debris") do
		workspace.Debris:Destroy()
	end
end

local onGameOver = Event.new()
onGameOver:connect(announceGameOver)
onGameOver:connect(cleanUpTheGame)

-- ...somewhere else in your code...
onGameOver:fire(69)

A couple things to note:

• It ought not matter in which order our functions announceGameOver and cleanUpTheGame will run; in a perfect world we’d have them happen at the same time. (In reality, one will always happen before the other and it’s the order in which we connect these functions that may ultimately play a part in what order they are actually called.)
• Not all connected functions will need to use all the arguments sent by the event, such as cleanUpTheGame  not needing the final score we sent.
• Not all connected functions will need to stay connected – we might need to disconnect functions as a cleanup measure.
• For brevity, I will be skipping over writing a wait method to yield until an event is fired.

With those things in mind, let’s see the different ways we can make event systems in Roblox Lua!

Click here to proceed to part 2 of this tutorial series.